Congress debates the size of water buckets while the barn burns.
More than 7 million students and their families rely on federally subsidized Stafford loans to help pay for college. Allowing the interest rate on Stafford loans to double is a significant burden on those already struggling with education costs and high unemployment.
The U. S. department of labor indicates that it would cost Missouri borrowers $160 million if the rate is allowed to double.
The Paul Ryan budget, recently passed by the House (Billy Long is an enthusiastic supporter) gives $4.6 trillion in new tax cuts to millionaires and billionaires. It pays for those tax-cuts with reductions to social programs, including cuts in federal support for college education.
The subsidies for the Stafford loans amount to 0.16% of the federal budget and less than 1.3% of the annual crony tax breaks in the Ryan Budget.
Both the Senate and the House are debating how to pay for this 1/600 of the budget. Billy’s House bill (H.R. 4628) would cut a fund for public and preventive health care. They want to take money from people’s health prevention.
The Senate bill (S. 2343) takes a far better approach: closing a tax loophole used by certain well-off professionals to avoid Medicare taxes.

Comments
Your Post
Here again is an example where the middle class ends up paying more while the wealthly are able to circumvent the system with a tax loophole.
Medicare Trust Fund?
If the Senate Bill would increase medicare taxes collected- would that not simply increase the Medicare Trust fund, and increase the debt owed to Medicare? By lending out Medicare Trust funds at a rate that barely keeps pace with inflation, we would be risking those medicare funds.
There must be a better way. Perhaps I am misunderstanding the situation?
Add new comment